The Science Philosophy of Mysticism: The Third Way of Knowing

BY NICOLE LAU

The Question of Knowledge

Are mysticism and science opposed? Must we choose between subjective experience and objective measurement? Between ancient wisdom and modern research?

The answer: No. Mysticism and science are complementary, not contradictory. They offer different but equally valid ways of knowing—and their integration creates a third way that is more complete than either alone.

This is not "New Age" wishful thinking. This is rigorous epistemology—understanding the strengths, limitations, and integration of different knowledge systems.

Two Ways of Knowing

Way 1: Mysticism (Subjective, Experiential, Holistic)

Method: Direct experience through contemplative practice

Strengths:

• Accesses subjective reality (consciousness, qualia, meaning)
• Holistic (sees wholes, not just parts)
• Transformative (changes the knower, not just knowledge)
• Addresses existential questions (meaning, purpose, identity)

Validation:

• Direct experience ("I know because I've experienced it")
• Phenomenological consistency (multiple practitioners report similar experiences)
• Lineage transmission (teachings verified across generations)
• Pragmatic results (does the practice work?)

Limitations:

• Subjective (hard to verify externally)
• Can be delusional (without proper discernment)
• Difficult to communicate (ineffable experiences)
• Lacks precision (qualitative, not quantitative)

Way 2: Science (Objective, Empirical, Reductionist)

Method: Empirical observation, hypothesis testing, peer review

Strengths:

• Accesses objective reality (measurable phenomena)
• Precise (quantitative measurements)
• Verifiable (others can replicate)
• Cumulative (builds on previous knowledge)
• Predictive (enables technological application)

Validation:

• Empirical testing (does the data support the hypothesis?)
• Peer review (expert scrutiny)
• Replication (can others get the same results?)
• Statistical significance (is it beyond chance?)

Limitations:

• Cannot access subjective experience directly (the "hard problem" of consciousness)
• Reductionist (breaks wholes into parts, may miss emergent properties)
• Value-neutral (doesn't address meaning or purpose)
• Limited to measurable phenomena (can't study what can't be measured)

The Complementarity Principle

Wave-Particle Duality as Metaphor

In quantum mechanics, light is both wave and particle. Which you observe depends on how you measure.

Similarly: Reality has both subjective and objective aspects. Which you access depends on your method.

• Mysticism accesses the "wave"—holistic, continuous, experiential
• Science accesses the "particle"—discrete, measurable, objective

Both are true. Both are necessary. Neither is complete alone.

The Limits of Each Approach

Science Alone:

Can measure brain states (neurons firing, neurotransmitters) but cannot access the subjective experience of consciousness (what it's like to see red, to feel joy).

This is the "hard problem" of consciousness (David Chalmers)—no amount of objective measurement explains subjective experience.

Mysticism Alone:

Has profound insights but lacks empirical verification. Without external validation, it can fall into:

• Delusion (mistaking imagination for reality)
• Dogma ("I experienced it, so it must be universally true")
• Incommunicability ("You can't understand unless you've experienced it")

The Integration:

Combine mystical experience with scientific verification:

• Mysticism provides the what (the experience, the insight)
• Science provides the how (the mechanism, the measurement)
• Together, they create complete knowledge

The Third Way: Contemplative Science

What It Is

Contemplative science: The integration of first-person contemplative practice with third-person empirical research.

Method:

• Practitioners engage in contemplative practice (meditation, yoga, etc.)
• Researchers measure objective correlates (brain activity, physiology, behavior)
• Phenomenological reports (first-person accounts) are integrated with empirical data (third-person measurements)

Examples:

1. Meditation Research

• Mystical claim: Meditation cultivates compassion, reduces suffering, increases awareness
• Scientific verification: fMRI shows increased activity in compassion-related brain regions, decreased amygdala reactivity, increased cortical thickness in attention areas
• Integration: We now understand both the subjective experience (what meditation feels like) and the objective mechanisms (how it changes the brain)

2. Psychedelic Research

• Mystical claim: Sacred plant medicines (psilocybin, ayahuasca) facilitate mystical experiences, healing, and insight
• Scientific verification: Clinical trials show efficacy for depression, PTSD, addiction; neuroimaging reveals decreased default mode network activity (ego dissolution)
• Integration: Ancient shamanic wisdom validated and refined through modern science

3. Energy Medicine

• Mystical claim: Subtle energy fields (chi, prana, biofield) exist and can be manipulated for healing
• Scientific exploration: Biofield science measures electromagnetic fields around the body, studies effects of practices like Reiki and qigong
• Integration: Moving from "it's all placebo" to "there may be measurable effects worth studying"

Where Science and Mysticism Converge

Convergence 1: Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness

Mystical claim: Consciousness is fundamental; the observer affects reality.

Scientific discovery: Quantum mechanics shows the observer does affect the observed (measurement problem, wave function collapse).

Convergence: Both suggest consciousness plays a role in reality, not just a passive byproduct.

Open questions: Is consciousness required for wave function collapse? Is there a quantum basis for consciousness?

Convergence 2: Non-Locality and Interconnection

Mystical claim: "All is One"—everything is interconnected at a deep level.

Scientific discovery: Quantum entanglement shows non-local correlations—particles remain connected regardless of distance.

Convergence: Both point to fundamental interconnection beyond classical separability.

Convergence 3: Holism and Emergence

Mystical claim: The whole is more than the sum of parts; reality is fundamentally holistic.

Scientific discovery: Complexity science, systems biology, emergence theory show that wholes have properties not reducible to parts.

Convergence: Both recognize that reductionism has limits; holistic understanding is necessary.

Convergence 4: Mind-Body Unity

Mystical claim: Mind and body are not separate; consciousness affects physiology.

Scientific discovery: Psychoneuroimmunology shows thoughts/emotions affect immune function; placebo effect demonstrates mind's power over body.

Convergence: Both reject Cartesian dualism; mind-body is a unified system.

What Science Needs from Mysticism

1. Access to Consciousness

Science can measure correlates of consciousness (brain activity) but cannot access consciousness itself.

Mysticism provides first-person methodologies for exploring consciousness directly.

2. Existential Meaning

Science is value-neutral—it tells us how things work, not why they matter.

Mysticism addresses meaning, purpose, and values—the existential dimension science cannot touch.

3. Holistic Understanding

Science's reductionist method is powerful but can miss emergent properties that only appear at the level of the whole.

Mysticism's holistic perspective complements reductionism.

4. Transformative Practice

Science produces knowledge about reality. Mysticism produces transformation of the knower.

Science needs mysticism's contemplative practices to cultivate the qualities (attention, compassion, wisdom) that make good scientists.

What Mysticism Needs from Science

1. Empirical Verification

Mystical experiences can be profound but also delusional. Without external validation, how do you know?

Science provides empirical testing to distinguish genuine insight from delusion.

2. Precision and Clarity

Mystical language is often poetic and ambiguous. This can obscure rather than illuminate.

Science's precise terminology and clear definitions help communicate mystical insights more effectively.

3. Mechanism Understanding

Mysticism knows that practices work (meditation reduces suffering). Science reveals how they work (neuroplasticity, neurotransmitter changes).

Understanding mechanisms allows optimization and refinement of practices.

4. Credibility and Accessibility

In the modern world, science has credibility. Mysticism is often dismissed as "woo."

Scientific validation gives mysticism legitimacy, making it accessible to skeptics and mainstream culture.

The Venn Diagram of Complete Knowledge

        [Mysticism]     (Subjective, Experiential)              ∩      [Philosophy]        ∩      [Science]   (Conceptual, Logical)      (Objective, Empirical)              ∩        [COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE]

Mysticism provides: Direct experience, subjective insight, transformative practice

Science provides: Empirical data, objective measurement, mechanistic understanding

Philosophy provides: Conceptual frameworks, logical analysis, integration

Where all three overlap: Complete knowledge—experientially grounded, empirically verified, conceptually coherent.

Historical Convergence: Mystics and Scientists

Ancient Mystics Who Sound Like Scientists

Buddha: "All phenomena are empty of inherent existence." (Sounds like quantum field theory—no solid particles, just fields and relationships.)

Lao Tzu: "The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao." (Sounds like Gödel's incompleteness theorem—some truths transcend formal systems.)

Heraclitus: "Everything flows." (Sounds like process philosophy and modern physics—reality is dynamic, not static.)

Modern Scientists Who Sound Like Mystics

Einstein: "The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science."

Niels Bohr: "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Non-dual thinking.)

Werner Heisenberg: "The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you."

David Bohm: "The notion of a separate organism is clearly an abstraction, as is also its boundary. Underlying all this is unbroken wholeness."

The Future: Integrated Knowledge

What's Emerging

• Contemplative neuroscience: Studying meditation, prayer, and mystical states with brain imaging
• Consciousness studies: Integrating first-person phenomenology with third-person neuroscience
• Psychedelic science: Clinical research on sacred medicines
• Energy medicine research: Measuring biofields and subtle energies
• Systems biology: Holistic understanding of organisms
• Quantum consciousness theories: Exploring quantum effects in biology and consciousness

The Vision

A world where:

• Scientists meditate and contemplate
• Mystics engage with empirical research
• Contemplative practice is part of scientific training
• Mystical insights are tested empirically
• Knowledge is both experientially grounded and empirically verified

Practical Integration

For Scientists

• Develop a contemplative practice (meditation, yoga, etc.)
• Study consciousness from the inside (first-person phenomenology)
• Recognize the limits of reductionism; embrace holism when appropriate
• Engage with mystical traditions respectfully and rigorously

For Mystics

• Learn basic science (especially neuroscience, quantum mechanics, systems theory)
• Subject your insights to empirical testing when possible
• Use precise language; avoid vague mystical jargon
• Collaborate with scientists; don't dismiss empiricism

For Everyone

• Cultivate both inner knowing (contemplation) and outer knowing (empiricism)
• Recognize that different questions require different methods
• Integrate subjective experience with objective understanding
• Seek the third way—the synthesis of mysticism and science

Conclusion: The Third Way of Knowing

Mystical science philosophy reveals:

• Mysticism and science are complementary, not contradictory
• Each has strengths and limitations—neither is complete alone
• Complementarity principle: reality has both subjective and objective aspects
• Convergence areas: quantum mechanics, non-locality, holism, mind-body unity
• Science needs mysticism: for consciousness access, meaning, holism, transformation
• Mysticism needs science: for verification, precision, mechanisms, credibility
• The third way: contemplative science integrating first-person and third-person methods
• Complete knowledge requires mysticism + science + philosophy

This framework is:

• Epistemologically rigorous: Recognizes different but valid ways of knowing
• Practically useful: Guides integration of contemplative and empirical approaches
• Future-oriented: Points toward a more complete understanding of reality

In the next article, we'll explore Mystical Religion Philosophy—the relationship between mysticism and organized religion, the distinction between experience and belief, and mystical pluralism.

---

This is Part XIII of the "Philosophy of Mysticism" series. Previous parts available at the links above.