Collaborative Divination: Group System Dynamics Sessions
Share
BY NICOLE LAU
Individual divination reveals personal truth. Collaborative divination reveals collective wisdom. When multiple people apply DDMT to the same questionβeach bringing unique perspectives, different divination systems, and varied life experiencesβthe convergence that emerges is more robust than any individual reading. Group sessions transform divination from solitary practice to collective intelligence.
This article provides complete frameworks for collaborative DDMTβfrom couples therapy sessions to organizational strategy workshopsβdesigned to harness group wisdom while maintaining rigor and avoiding groupthink.
Collaborative DDMT: Core Principles
Principle 1: Diversity Strengthens Convergence
Convergence from diverse perspectives is more trustworthy than convergence from similar perspectives.
Example:
β’ 3 Tarot readers all see "The Tower" β 100% convergence, but single-system
β’ Tarot reader (Tower), I Ching reader (Hex 23), Astrologer (Pluto square) β 100% convergence across systems β Higher confidence
Principle 2: Individual First, Collective Second
Avoid groupthink by having each person do their reading independently before sharing.
Process:
1. Silent individual readings (15 min)
2. Individual write-up (no discussion yet)
3. Share readings one by one
4. Identify convergence and divergence
5. Collective synthesis
Principle 3: Facilitator Maintains Structure
Group sessions need a facilitator to keep process on track, prevent dominance, and ensure all voices heard.
Facilitator role:
β’ Timekeeper (keep to schedule)
β’ Process guardian (follow DDMT steps)
β’ Equity enforcer (equal airtime for all)
β’ Synthesis guide (help group find convergence)
Format 1: Couples DDMT Session
Use Case
Couple facing major decision (move cities, have children, career change) uses DDMT together.
Session Structure (90 minutes)
Phase 1: Individual Readings (30 min)
β’ Partner A and Partner B sit separately (different rooms or back-to-back)
β’ Each does complete DDMT reading on same question
β’ Question: "Should we move to New York for my job offer?"
β’ Each person:
- Maps variables (10-15 variables)
- Does divination (Tarot, I Ching, or Astrology)
- Quantifies polarity
- Writes prediction and decision recommendation
β’ No discussion during this phase
Phase 2: Share Readings (20 min)
β’ Partner A shares complete reading (10 min)
- Variables identified
- Cards/hexagrams drawn
- Interpretation
- Recommendation
β’ Partner B listens without interrupting
β’ Partner B shares complete reading (10 min)
β’ Partner A listens without interrupting
Phase 3: Convergence Analysis (20 min)
β’ Together, create convergence matrix:
| Variable | Partner A | Partner B | Converge? |
|----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| Financial | +7 (good opportunity) | +8 (salary increase) | β Yes |
| Relationship | -3 (stress on us) | -5 (worried about us) | β Yes |
| Career | +9 (dream job) | +6 (good for career) | β Yes |
| Lifestyle | -6 (hate big cities) | +4 (excited for city life) | β No |
β’ Calculate convergence: 75% (3 out of 4 variables agree)
Phase 4: Divergence Exploration (15 min)
β’ Focus on divergence: Lifestyle (-6 vs +4, 10-point gap!)
β’ Partner A: "Why do you see Lifestyle as positive?"
β’ Partner B: "I drew Three of Wands (expansion, new horizons). I'm excited for museums, culture, diversity."
β’ Partner A: "I drew Four of Cups (apathy, boredom with options). I feel overwhelmed by crowds, noise, pace."
β’ Insight: Different values (A values quiet/nature, B values stimulation/culture)
Phase 5: Synthesis & Decision (5 min)
β’ Convergence: Financial and Career are strong positives (both agree)
β’ Divergence: Lifestyle is the key tension
β’ Decision framework: "If we move, how do we honor both needs?"
- A needs: Regular nature escapes (weekend trips upstate)
- B needs: Engage with city culture (museums, events)
β’ Final decision: "Yes to move, with intentional lifestyle design to meet both needs"
Tools for Couples Sessions
β’ Shared Miro board (both can add sticky notes, draw diagrams)
β’ Two sets of Tarot cards (each person has their own deck)
β’ Timer (keep phases on schedule)
β’ Worksheet: Convergence matrix (print or digital)
Format 2: Family DDMT Council
Use Case
Family of 4 (parents + 2 teens) deciding whether to relocate for parent's job.
Session Structure (2 hours)
Phase 1: Question Framing (10 min)
β’ Facilitator (parent or external): "We're deciding whether to move to Seattle. Each person will share their perspective using DDMT."
β’ Ground rules:
- Everyone's reading is valid (no "you're wrong")
- Listen without interrupting
- Focus on understanding, not convincing
Phase 2: Individual Readings (30 min)
β’ Each family member does reading separately
β’ Adapted for teens: Simplified DDMT (5-7 variables, basic polarity)
β’ Parent 1: Full DDMT (Tarot + I Ching)
β’ Parent 2: Full DDMT (Astrology + Stock-Flow)
β’ Teen 1 (age 16): Simplified (Tarot only, 5 variables)
β’ Teen 2 (age 14): Simplified (I Ching only, 5 variables)
Phase 3: Round-Robin Sharing (40 min, 10 min each)
β’ Each person shares reading
β’ Others listen, take notes
β’ No debate yet, just understanding
Phase 4: Collective Mapping (30 min)
β’ Large whiteboard or poster paper
β’ Create collective causal loop diagram:
- Each person adds their key variables as nodes
- Draw arrows showing relationships
- Identify loops (virtuous or vicious)
β’ Example loops discovered:
- Loop 1 (Parent 1): New job β Income β Family security β Less stress β Better parenting (R+)
- Loop 2 (Teen 1): Move β Leave friends β Loneliness β Depression β Poor school performance (R-)
- Loop 3 (Teen 2): Move β New school β New opportunities β Growth β Confidence (R+)
Phase 5: Synthesis (10 min)
β’ Convergence: All agree new job is good financially
β’ Divergence: Teens have opposite predictions (one sees disaster, one sees opportunity)
β’ Decision: "We'll move, but with support systems for Teen 1 (therapy, frequent visits to old friends, gradual transition)"
Key Insight
Family DDMT reveals hidden dynamics (Teen 1's fear of loneliness wasn't voiced until reading). Divination creates safe container for truth-telling.
Format 3: Organizational Strategy Workshop
Use Case
Startup leadership team (CEO, CTO, COO, CFO) deciding whether to pivot product strategy.
Session Structure (Half-day, 4 hours)
Phase 1: Context Setting (30 min)
β’ Facilitator (external consultant or CEO): Present situation
β’ Question: "Should we pivot from B2B to B2C?"
β’ Stakes: $2M runway, 18 months to profitability, 25 employees
β’ Each leader assigned a lens:
- CEO: Market dynamics (Tarot)
- CTO: Technical feasibility (I Ching)
- COO: Operational impact (Stock-Flow)
- CFO: Financial projections (Monte Carlo)
Phase 2: Individual Analysis (60 min)
β’ Each leader does deep DDMT analysis from their lens
β’ CEO (Tarot): Draws 10-card spread, maps market variables
β’ CTO (I Ching): Consults hexagrams for technical path
β’ COO (Stock-Flow): Models team capacity, customer acquisition
β’ CFO (Monte Carlo): Runs 1000 simulations of financial scenarios
Phase 3: Presentation Round (60 min, 15 min each)
β’ Each leader presents findings
β’ CEO: "Tarot shows Three of Wands (expansion opportunity) but Five of Pentacles (resource scarcity). Market is ready, but we're not."
β’ CTO: "I Ching Hex 5 (Waiting). Technical infrastructure needs 6 months before B2C ready."
β’ COO: "Stock-flow shows team capacity hits zero in 3 months if we pivot now. Need to hire 5 people first."
β’ CFO: "Monte Carlo shows 35% success if pivot now, 68% if wait 6 months and prepare."
Phase 4: Convergence Mapping (45 min)
β’ Facilitator creates convergence matrix on whiteboard:
| System | Pivot Now? | Key Insight | Timing |
|--------|-----------|-------------|--------|
| Tarot (Market) | Maybe | Opportunity exists, resources lacking | Not yet |
| I Ching (Tech) | No | Infrastructure not ready | 6 months |
| Stock-Flow (Ops) | No | Team capacity insufficient | 3 months |
| Monte Carlo (Finance) | No | 35% vs 68% success rate | 6 months |
β’ Convergence: 100% agree "Not now"
β’ Convergence on timing: 6 months (when tech ready and team hired)
Phase 5: Action Planning (45 min)
β’ Decision: "Pivot in 6 months, prepare now"
β’ Action plan:
- Month 1-3: Hire 5 people (COO leads)
- Month 1-6: Build B2C infrastructure (CTO leads)
- Month 4-6: B2C market research (CEO leads)
- Month 1-6: Financial modeling refinement (CFO leads)
- Month 6: Re-convene, final go/no-go decision
β’ Validation: Set metrics for 6-month check-in
Tools for Organizational Sessions
β’ Large room with whiteboards on all walls
β’ Miro board (digital collaboration, remote participants)
β’ Projector (show Monte Carlo results, charts)
β’ Sticky notes (color-coded by person/lens)
β’ Voting dots (if consensus needed on priorities)
Format 4: Peer Supervision Group (Ongoing)
Use Case
5 DDMT practitioners meet monthly to review each other's readings, improve accuracy, share learnings.
Session Structure (90 min, monthly)
Phase 1: Case Presentation (20 min)
β’ One member presents a reading they did (volunteer or rotation)
β’ Shares: Question, variables, divination results, prediction, decision
β’ Group listens, takes notes
Phase 2: Peer Review (30 min)
β’ Each member offers feedback:
- "What I noticed: You identified 15 variables but only quantified 8. The unquantified ones might be important."
- "Alternative interpretation: You read The Tower as 'crisis' but it could also be 'necessary breakthrough.'"
- "Convergence check: Your Tarot and I Ching both said 'wait' but you decided to act immediately. Why?"
β’ Presenter responds, clarifies, defends or adjusts
Phase 3: Collective Re-Reading (20 min)
β’ Group does quick reading on same question
β’ Each person draws one card or consults one hexagram
β’ Share results
β’ Compare to original reading: Does group converge with original? Diverge?
Phase 4: Learning Extraction (15 min)
β’ What did we learn from this case?
β’ Pattern recognition: "This is the 3rd time we've seen Tower + Hex 23 together. It always means 'system breakdown, wait for rebuilding.'"
β’ Accuracy tracking: If reading was from 3+ months ago, validate outcome. Was prediction accurate?
Phase 5: Skill Building (5 min)
β’ Quick teaching moment
β’ One member shares a technique: "I've started using sensitivity analysis and it's game-changing. Let me show you..."
Benefits of Peer Supervision
β’ Accountability (knowing you'll present to group improves rigor)
β’ Blind spots revealed (others see what you miss)
β’ Collective learning (5 people = 5x the experience)
β’ Accuracy improvement (group feedback refines interpretation skills)
Digital Tools for Collaborative DDMT
Tool 1: Miro (Visual Collaboration)
Setup:
β’ Create board: "DDMT Collaborative Session - [Question]"
β’ Sections:
- Individual Readings (one frame per person)
- Convergence Matrix (shared table)
- Causal Loop Diagram (collaborative drawing)
- Decision Framework (synthesis)
Features:
β’ Real-time collaboration (everyone edits simultaneously)
β’ Sticky notes (color-coded by person)
β’ Voting (dot voting on priorities)
β’ Timer (built-in, keeps session on track)
β’ Templates (save DDMT template, reuse for each session)
Tool 2: Zoom + Breakout Rooms
For remote sessions:
β’ Main room: Facilitator explains process
β’ Breakout rooms: Individual readings (15 min, solo)
β’ Return to main room: Share readings
β’ Screen share: Show convergence matrix, charts
β’ Chat: Async questions, links to resources
Tool 3: Google Docs (Collaborative Writing)
Setup:
β’ Create doc: "DDMT Session - [Date] - [Question]"
β’ Structure:
- Question
- Individual Readings (each person has section)
- Convergence Analysis (collaborative section)
- Decision (final synthesis)
β’ Everyone edits in real-time
β’ Comment feature: Ask questions, suggest edits
β’ Version history: See how synthesis evolved
Facilitation Best Practices
Practice 1: Set Clear Roles
β’ Facilitator: Keeps process, manages time
β’ Scribe: Documents insights (on whiteboard or digital)
β’ Timekeeper: Alerts when phase ending
β’ Participants: Do readings, share insights
Practice 2: Use Talking Stick
β’ Physical object (stick, stone, card) passed around
β’ Only person holding object can speak
β’ Prevents interruptions, ensures equity
Practice 3: Separate Divergence from Convergence
β’ First: Identify where we agree (convergence)
β’ Second: Explore where we disagree (divergence)
β’ Don't try to force consensus on divergenceβhold the tension
Practice 4: Validate Later
β’ Set group validation date (3-6 months)
β’ Reconvene: Was collective prediction accurate?
β’ Learn: What did we get right? What did we miss?
β’ Improve: Adjust process for next session
Common Pitfalls & Solutions
Pitfall 1: Groupthink
Problem: Everyone converges too quickly, no one challenges assumptions
Solution: Assign "devil's advocate" roleβone person must argue opposite view
Pitfall 2: Dominant Voices
Problem: One person (often leader) dominates, others defer
Solution: Share in reverse hierarchy (junior speaks first, senior last)
Pitfall 3: Analysis Paralysis
Problem: Group gets stuck in endless analysis, no decision
Solution: Set decision deadline, use voting if consensus impossible
Pitfall 4: Conflict Avoidance
Problem: Group glosses over divergence to maintain harmony
Solution: Facilitator explicitly names divergence: "I notice we disagree on X. Let's explore that."
Key Collaborative DDMT Learnings
1. Diversity strengthens convergence
100% convergence from diverse perspectives (different systems, different people) is more trustworthy than 100% from similar perspectives.
2. Individual first, collective second prevents groupthink
Silent individual readings before group discussion ensures authentic perspectives, not social conformity.
3. Divergence is data, not problem
When readings diverge, it reveals complexity. Don't force consensusβexplore the tension.
4. Facilitation is essential
Without structure, group sessions devolve into debate or dominance. Facilitator maintains DDMT rigor.
5. Collective wisdom emerges from process
Group DDMT isn't about averaging opinionsβit's about synthesis that transcends individual perspectives.
Collaborative DDMT transforms divination from solitary to collective, from individual insight to group wisdom, from one perspective to multi-dimensional understanding. This is how you practice DDMT together. For those drawn to deepen their journey with tarot as a shared practice, the The 52-Week Tarot Journey offers a year of weekly spreads and daily pulls that can anchor both solitary and group work, while the 30-Day Tarot Practice Workbook provides structured exercises perfect for building fluency before bringing others into the circle. For those wanting to dive deeper into the archetypal currents that surface in any reading, Jung and the Archetype illuminates the bridges between tarot, astrology, and the unconscious that make collaborative insight so potent.
