Cultural Appropriation vs Appreciation: Navigating the Line
Share
BY NICOLE LAU
You want to practice yoga. Burn sage. Work with chakras. Use a singing bowl. Wear a bindi. Get a dreamcatcher tattoo. Study Kabbalah. Practice smudging. Learn from indigenous wisdom.
But you're not Indian. Not Native American. Not Jewish. Not from the culture that created these practices.
So the question arises: Is this cultural appreciation—respectful engagement with wisdom traditions? Or is it cultural appropriation—taking what doesn't belong to you, stripping it of context, and causing harm?
This is one of the most important and difficult questions in modern spiritual practice. The line between appreciation and appropriation is real, but it's not always clear. This article will help you navigate it with integrity, nuance, and respect.
Defining the Terms
Cultural Appropriation
Definition: Taking elements from a culture that is not your own—especially a marginalized culture—without permission, understanding, or reciprocity, often in ways that cause harm, erase context, or profit from what was stolen.
Key characteristics:
- Power imbalance - Dominant culture taking from marginalized culture
- Lack of understanding - Using symbols/practices without knowing their meaning or significance
- Decontextualization - Stripping sacred practices from their cultural/spiritual context
- Commodification - Profiting from what was taken (selling "tribal" fashion, "exotic" yoga)
- Harm to source community - Perpetuating stereotypes, erasing history, preventing access to their own traditions
- No reciprocity - Taking without giving back, learning, or supporting the source community
Examples:
- Wearing a Native American headdress to a music festival (sacred ceremonial item reduced to costume)
- Getting a Sanskrit tattoo without understanding the meaning (treating sacred language as decoration)
- White sage "smudging" kits sold by non-Native companies (commodifying closed practice, contributing to overharvesting)
- Yoga studios that erase Hinduism and sell "just the stretching" (spiritual colonialism)
- Fashion brands using indigenous patterns without credit or compensation (theft and erasure)
Cultural Appreciation
Definition: Engaging with another culture's practices, symbols, or wisdom with respect, understanding, reciprocity, and permission—in ways that honor the source and support the community.
Key characteristics:
- Deep study - Learning the history, context, and meaning
- Respect for boundaries - Honoring what is open vs. closed, sacred vs. shareable
- Authentic teachers - Learning from people within the tradition, not self-appointed "gurus"
- Reciprocity - Giving back to the source community (financially, through advocacy, amplifying voices)
- Acknowledgment - Crediting the source, not claiming ownership or "discovering" what already existed
- Humility - Recognizing yourself as a student, not an authority
Examples:
- Studying yoga with teachers who honor its Hindu roots, learning philosophy alongside asana
- Learning meditation from Buddhist teachers, supporting Tibetan refugee communities
- Practicing Kabbalah with permission and guidance from Jewish teachers
- Using sacred geometry while acknowledging its origins in multiple traditions
- Working with Tarot while studying its Western esoteric lineage
The Gray Zone: Why It's Complicated
The line between appropriation and appreciation isn't always clear because:
1. Culture is Dynamic, Not Static
Cultures have always exchanged, influenced, and borrowed from each other. Buddhism traveled from India to Tibet to China to Japan, transforming at each stage. Is that appropriation or evolution?
The difference: Power dynamics. When exchange happens between equals, it's cultural evolution. When a dominant culture takes from a marginalized culture without reciprocity, it's appropriation.
2. Spiritual Practices vs. Cultural Practices
Some practices are inherently spiritual (meditation, prayer, ritual) and may be more universally accessible. Others are culturally specific (tied to particular histories, traumas, identities) and require cultural membership or permission.
Example: Meditation techniques (breathing, mindfulness) are more open than specific Native American ceremonies (sweat lodge, vision quest) which are tied to cultural initiation and lineage.
3. Open vs. Closed Practices
Some traditions are open (anyone can learn). Some are closed (require initiation, lineage, or cultural membership).
Generally Open:
- Buddhist meditation (though specific lineages may have restrictions)
- Yoga (though commercialization is problematic)
- Tarot, astrology (Western esoteric traditions)
- Hermetic/alchemical practices
- Sacred geometry
Generally Closed or Restricted:
- Specific Native American ceremonies (sweat lodge, sun dance, vision quest)
- Certain Tantric initiations
- Vodou/Santería priesthood (requires initiation)
- Some Kabbalistic practices (traditionally require Jewish lineage or formal study)
- Indigenous shamanic practices (require cultural context and permission)
The problem: Not everyone agrees on what's open vs. closed, and boundaries shift over time.
4. Individual vs. Systemic
One person practicing yoga respectfully is different from a billion-dollar industry that erases Hinduism and exploits South Asian teachers.
Appropriation is often systemic, not just individual. You can practice respectfully as an individual while still being part of a larger problematic system.
The Framework: Seven Questions to Ask
Before engaging with a practice from another culture, ask yourself:
1. What is the history of this practice?
Understand:
- Where did it come from? (Culture, tradition, lineage)
- What does it mean in its original context? (Sacred? Ceremonial? Daily practice?)
- What is the history of colonization, oppression, or appropriation related to this culture?
Example: White sage smudging comes from specific Native American traditions. These communities were violently colonized, their practices banned, and now white sage is overharvested and sold by non-Native companies. Knowing this history changes how you approach the practice.
2. Is this practice open or closed?
Research:
- Do practitioners from the source culture say it's open to outsiders?
- Does it require initiation, lineage, or cultural membership?
- Are there specific protocols for outsiders who want to learn?
How to find out: Ask. Read books by practitioners from the culture. Seek teachers from the tradition. Don't assume access.
3. Am I learning from authentic sources?
Check:
- Are my teachers from the culture or trained by authentic lineage holders?
- Am I learning from books/videos by cultural insiders or outsiders?
- Am I supporting authentic teachers or cultural appropriators?
Red flag: White "shamans" selling Native American ceremonies, non-Hindu "gurus" teaching yoga without acknowledging its roots, non-Jewish "Kabbalists" claiming secret knowledge.
4. Am I engaging deeply or superficially?
Assess:
- Have I studied the philosophy, history, and context—or just the technique?
- Am I willing to engage with the difficult parts (colonization, oppression, complexity)?
- Am I treating this as a lifelong practice or a trend?
Appropriation is often superficial (wearing a bindi to Coachella). Appreciation is deep (studying Hindu philosophy for years).
5. Am I giving back?
Consider:
- Am I financially supporting the source community? (Paying authentic teachers, donating to cultural organizations)
- Am I amplifying voices from the culture? (Sharing their work, not speaking over them)
- Am I advocating for their rights and sovereignty?
Reciprocity is essential. If you benefit from a tradition, give back.
6. What is my relationship to power and privilege?
Reflect:
- Do I belong to the dominant culture taking from a marginalized culture?
- Am I benefiting from systems that oppress the source community?
- Am I aware of my privilege and how it affects my access to these practices?
Example: A white American practicing Native American spirituality has different power dynamics than a Native person reclaiming their own traditions after colonization.
7. Would practitioners from the source culture approve?
Imagine:
- If someone from the source culture saw my practice, would they feel respected or offended?
- Am I doing this in a way that honors the tradition or distorts it?
- Would I be comfortable explaining my practice to someone from the culture?
This is the respect test. If you'd be embarrassed to explain your practice to a cultural insider, that's a red flag.
Case Studies: Appropriation vs. Appreciation
Case 1: Yoga
Appropriation:
- Teaching yoga as "just exercise" while erasing its Hindu roots
- Renaming poses to avoid "religious" language (cultural erasure)
- Profiting from yoga while South Asian teachers are underpaid or excluded
- Treating yoga as a commodity (beer yoga, goat yoga, etc.)
Appreciation:
- Studying yoga philosophy (Yoga Sutras, Bhagavad Gita) alongside asana
- Learning from teachers who honor the tradition's Hindu roots
- Acknowledging yoga's origins in every class
- Supporting South Asian yoga teachers and communities
- Practicing with humility, not claiming to be a "guru"
Case 2: Smudging
Appropriation:
- Buying "smudge kits" from non-Native companies
- Using white sage (sacred to specific tribes, now overharvested)
- Calling it "smudging" without understanding the specific ceremonial context
- Ignoring that Native practices were criminalized until 1978
Appreciation (or better: Alternatives):
- Learning about smoke cleansing traditions from your own ancestry (European, African, Asian cultures all have smoke rituals)
- Using herbs from your own region (rosemary, lavender, mugwort)
- If you do use sage, buy from Native-owned businesses and learn the proper protocols
- Acknowledge the source and support Native sovereignty
Case 3: Chakras
Appropriation:
- Treating chakras as "energy centers" without acknowledging Hindu/Tantric origins
- Selling "chakra healing" products without understanding the philosophy
- Mixing chakras with random New Age concepts (crystals, angels, etc.) without coherence
Appreciation:
- Studying chakras within the context of Tantra, Kundalini yoga, and Hindu philosophy
- Learning from teachers trained in authentic lineages
- Acknowledging the source every time you teach or practice
- Understanding chakras as part of a complete spiritual system, not isolated "energy centers"
Special Considerations
Ancestry and Lineage
Your relationship to a practice changes if it's part of your ancestry:
- A person of Jewish descent studying Kabbalah has different access than a non-Jew
- A person of African descent practicing Vodou is reclaiming heritage, not appropriating
- A person of Celtic ancestry working with Celtic practices is connecting to lineage
But: Ancestry doesn't give you automatic authority. You still need to study, learn from elders, and practice with respect.
Conversion and Initiation
Some traditions allow outsiders to join through formal processes:
- Converting to Judaism (then studying Kabbalah)
- Taking Buddhist refuge vows (then practicing within that lineage)
- Initiation into Vodou/Santería (becoming a priest/priestess)
This is not appropriation—it's joining the tradition through proper channels.
Universal vs. Cultural-Specific
Some practices are more universal (meditation, breathwork, prayer). Others are culturally specific (specific ceremonies, songs, stories tied to particular lands and peoples).
Constant Unification perspective: The constants (vertical structure of consciousness, death-rebirth cycles, etc.) are universal. The cultural expressions (chakras, Sephiroth, etc.) are specific. You can work with the constants while respecting the cultural expressions.
What To Do If You've Appropriated
If you realize you've been appropriating:
- Acknowledge it - Don't get defensive. Own the mistake.
- Educate yourself - Learn the history, the harm, the context you missed.
- Stop the harmful practice - If it's a closed practice, stop. If it's open but you were doing it disrespectfully, change how you engage.
- Make amends - Support the source community, amplify their voices, give back.
- Do better going forward - Use the seven questions framework for future practices.
Guilt is not useful. Accountability and change are.
Conclusion: The Path of Respectful Engagement
Cultural appreciation is possible. You can engage with wisdom traditions from cultures not your own—if you do it with:
- Deep study - Not superficial engagement
- Respect for boundaries - Honoring what's open vs. closed
- Authentic teachers - Learning from cultural insiders
- Reciprocity - Giving back to source communities
- Acknowledgment - Crediting the source, not claiming ownership
- Humility - Recognizing yourself as a student, not an authority
- Awareness of power - Understanding privilege and systemic harm
The line between appropriation and appreciation is not always clear, but the intention to navigate it with integrity is what matters.
Ask the questions. Do the work. Listen to voices from the source cultures. Be willing to be wrong and change.
This is how we build a spiritual practice that is both personally authentic and culturally respectful—a practice that honors the wisdom of all traditions while causing no harm.
Wisdom belongs to no one and everyone. The constants are universal. But the cultural expressions of those constants are sacred, specific, and deserve respect. You can learn from many traditions without stealing from any. You can integrate wisdom without appropriating culture. You can be a bridge without being a colonizer. The path is narrow, but it exists. Walk it with humility, study, reciprocity, and respect—and you walk in integrity. For those seeking to explore these universal currents with reverence, the guided journey through the Cosmic Alignment Ritual Kit offers a structured way to sync with celestial flow, while the Jung and the Archetype deep dive bridges tarot and astrology with the unconscious, and the Sacred Space Cleanse provides an ethical alternative for energy clearing rooted in open traditions.
