ADVERTISEMENTS
UFT Truth Convergence Observatory & Cosmic Dynamical Systems
UFT · Comparative Divination Research

The Convergence Observatory

When different divination systems are asked about the same question, do their interpretations move toward a shared direction over time—or become more divergent? The Convergence Observatory is a personal logging and comparison tool for recording readings from different methods, revisiting the same question at later dates, and visualizing how closely their broad conclusions align.

01 · Record the Readings

Log a round of interpretations from Tarot, I Ching, Qimen Dun Jia, Six Yao, astrology, or another method. Preserve the original notes so the summary never replaces the source reading.

02 · Normalize the Direction

Assign each reading a shared broad outcome label—such as favorable, unfavorable, mixed, delayed, or unclear—so different systems can be compared on one common scale.

03 · Observe the Trend

A single line plots the convergence score for each observation round. Rising values mean the selected outcome labels agree more closely; falling values mean they agree less.

04 · Keep the Evidence

Review the original entries in a table, compare notes over time, and export a CSV backup for your own analysis.

How to interpret the chart: The score measures agreement between the broad labels you assign to readings. It does not measure whether a prediction is true, prove that divination methods are objectively converging, or calculate the probability of an event. Consistent labels and the same underlying question make the comparison more meaningful.
ADVERTISEMENTS
UFT · The Convergence Observatory

Track the Shape of a Prediction

Record multiple readings about the same question, assign each one a broad outcome, and see whether their conclusions converge or diverge across successive rounds. Your notes remain available in the raw-data table beneath the chart.

Log an Observation Round

Use the same series name when revisiting the same question over time. Add at least two readings per round. Your data is saved in this browser on this device; it is not uploaded to a server.

Convergence Timeline

One line shows the convergence score for each saved round in the selected series.

Latest Convergence—
Change Since First Round—
Recorded Rounds0
Save at least one observation round to begin your timeline.

Score = the share of readings in the most common broad-outcome category within a round. For example, 2 matching labels out of 3 readings produce 67%. The score summarizes label agreement, not predictive accuracy.

Original Observation Log

Each saved round preserves its methods, outcome labels, and original notes. Export the log regularly if you want an independent backup.

No observation rounds saved yet.

This is a reflective comparison tool. The chart reflects the categories entered by the user; it does not independently interpret a reading, establish causation, or verify a prediction. Keep the question and category definitions consistent when comparing rounds.

UFT · Method Notes

Frequently Asked Questions

Understand what the Observatory measures, how to enter readings consistently, and what its convergence curve can—and cannot—tell you.

What does “convergence” mean in this tool?
Convergence means that the broad outcome labels assigned to different readings agree within the same observation round. The tool counts how many readings share the most common label and divides that number by the total number of readings. Three readings with two matching labels score about 67%; three matching labels score 100%.
Does a high score mean the prediction is likely to happen?
No. A high score means the labels you entered agree with one another. It does not establish predictive accuracy, objective truth, causation, or a probability of the event. Accuracy would require a separate, consistently defined record of eventual outcomes.
Why do I need to choose a broad outcome for each reading?
Different divination systems use different symbols and interpretive vocabularies. A shared broad label makes it possible to compare them on one scale, but it simplifies the original interpretation. Keep the detailed notes so the category never becomes a substitute for the actual reading.
Which outcome labels can I use?
The built-in options are Favorable / Positive, Unfavorable / Negative, Mixed / Conditional, Delayed / Blocked, and Neutral / Unclear. Apply them consistently across methods and across time. If a result is conditional, avoid forcing it into a simple positive or negative category merely to make the chart look tidy.
How should I compare results over time?
Use the same Observation Series / Question for repeated rounds about the same underlying matter. Record the actual observation date, preserve the original notes, and avoid changing what each category means midway through the series. A rising line shows greater agreement between labels; a falling line shows less agreement.
Can I compare different questions in the same account?
Yes. Give each question or event its own Observation Series / Question name. The chart lets you select one series at a time, while the table keeps all series together for review.
Where is my data saved?
This version saves records in the local storage of the browser and device where you use the tool. It does not send entries to a server. Browser privacy settings, clearing site data, or changing devices may make local records unavailable, so use Export CSV to keep an independent copy.
Can I edit or delete a saved round?
Use Load to bring a round back into the form. Saving the loaded information creates a new round rather than replacing the old one, so delete the previous row separately if you intended to replace it. Each row also has a Delete action.
Why does the chart show only one line?
The Observatory is designed to show one convergence score per observation round, rather than a separate line for every divination method. The underlying method-by-method labels and notes remain in the original observation table.